Skip to content
VORTResearch

Reports

Milan––:––. Regular trading hours, with each exchange’s holidays: Borsa Italiana’s for Milan, the NYSE’s for New York.

New York––:––. Regular trading hours, with each exchange’s holidays: Borsa Italiana’s for Milan, the NYSE’s for New York.

All reports

NIKE, Inc. NKE on NYSE

Consumer Discretionary — Athletic Footwear & Apparel

A first-rank brand at half price

The shares sit on their 52-week low, half the level of a year ago, on a reported price/earnings ratio of 18 times and a dividend yield of 4.2%. But that 18 times is flattered: fiscal 2026 earnings contained a $986 million tariff recovery. Strip it out and Nike trades near 24 times depressed earnings. You are not buying a cheap multiple — you are buying a brand at half price and being paid to wait.

Published , 19 pages, 14 slides.

Share on X

The download link is made when you press, and is valid for ten minutes.

Cover of the Vort report on NIKE, Inc.

Rating

Buy

Fair value

$50

Last close

$37.14

Change on the previous close: +5.21% (+$1.84)

Upside to fair value

+35%

from the last close

$38.41 at the report$50 fair value

The US market is closed: the price is the close of October 15, 2026. During the session the quote is delayed up to 15 minutes. The fair value is the report’s, dated September 7, 2026; it does not move with the market. Vort Research provides informational and educational content. It is not personalised financial advice nor a solicitation to invest.

The stock page

12-month target
$50
Rating
BUY
Market cap
~$57bn

Fiscal year 2026, ended 31 May, reported 30 June. Source: SEC EDGAR (opens in a new tab)

The thesis in three points

  1. The multiple is not what it looks like.

    Fiscal 2026 earnings contain an expected recovery of $986 million of tariffs — worth about $0.53 a share after tax. Reported earnings per share of roughly $2.10 are nearer $1.57 underneath, so the 18 times on the screen is closer to 24 times. You are not buying a cheap multiple.

  2. You are buying a brand at half price, and being paid to wait.

    The shares have fallen from $76.97 to $38.41 and sit about 1% above their 52-week low. The dividend yields 4.2% and is covered by earnings that are themselves depressed. Few turnarounds pay this well for patience.

  3. The decline has stopped. The recovery has not started.

    Revenue was $46.40 billion, up 0.2% after a 10% fall — two years after the peak the top line has stabilised without recovering. Both halves of that sentence are true, and the market is pricing only the second.

from the 52-week high
−50%
dividend yield, covered
4.2%
one-off tariff recovery in Q4
$986m
North America, the one market growing
+3%

The accounts in brief

Fiscal year 2026, ended 31 May, reported 30 June

FY2026 revenue
$46.40bn
rising: +0.2%
FY2026 net income
$3.11bn
falling: −3.5%
EPS reported
~$2.10
EPS ex-tariff recovery
~$1.57
falling: −25%
Q4 wholesale
+4%
rising: rebuilding
Q4 NIKE Direct
−7%
falling: de-emphasised
Q4 Greater China
−12%
falling: −17% cn
Q4 Converse
−32%
falling: all territories

The analysis

Free summary

What the reported earnings contained

The fourth quarter included an expected recovery of $986 million of tariffs levied under emergency powers and later reversed, lifting the quarter's gross margin by roughly 900 basis points. It is real cash and it is, by definition, non-recurring. Strip it out and the honest multiple is 24 times — on earnings that are themselves depressed against a fiscal 2022 peak above $3.90.

A decade of strategy, reversed on purpose

From about 2017 Nike pulled demand into its own stores and app. It worked on margin and failed on distribution: the shelf space it vacated was filled by someone else. The quarter shows the reversal — wholesale +4%, Direct −7%, Brand Digital −12%. The risk is not that wholesale fails to rebuild; it is that Direct falls faster than wholesale recovers.

Three geographies, three different problems

North America grew 3% and was the sole growth driver — the evidence the plan works where it has been applied first. Greater China fell 12%, and 17% currency-neutral, against domestic brands that have taken the category. No part of our Base case assumes China returns to growth.

The decline has stopped. The recovery has not started. Both statements are true, and the market is currently pricing only the second.

Vort Research — Nike initiation, 7 September 2026

What it does, and how it earns

The business

Nike designs and sells athletic footwear and apparel. It owns the Nike, Jordan and Converse brands, sells through wholesale partners and its own stores and digital channels, and operates across North America, EMEA, Greater China and Asia Pacific. It has been the dominant brand in its category for four decades.

Where the revenue comes from

  • Wholesale — through retail partners+4% in Q4
  • NIKE Direct — own stores and digital−7% in Q4
  • Converse — heritage casual−32% in Q4

The model

The two channels differ sharply. Direct carries the full retail margin plus the cost of stores and customer acquisition; wholesale gives margin away to the retailer but occupies shelf space that would otherwise hold a competitor.

The Vort verdict in four lines

This is a qualitative summary and not a recommendation.

  • Brand

    First rank

    Four decades of category leadership. The cultural position was never lost — the shelf space was.

  • Dividend

    4.2%, covered

    Paid while the turnaround proves itself, and covered by earnings that are already depressed.

  • Turnaround

    Early

    North America grew 3% and wholesale rebuilt. Two years of effort have still produced flat revenue.

  • China

    Still falling

    −12%, and −17% currency-neutral, against domestic brands. Our Base case assumes it never recovers.

Who it competes with

CompanyWhere it competes
NIKEThis stockThree brands, two channels, four geographies
On HoldingRunning, premium — took the share Nike vacated at speciality retail
Deckers (Hoka)The same playbook, a different silhouette
AdidasRecovered strongly from a crisis of its own
Anta, Li-NingThe reason Greater China is not coming back quickly

New entrants scores unusually high for a category this old, and that is the heart of the problem: On and Hoka went from nothing to material share inside a decade, which proved that a distinctive product plus running-store distribution can breach what looked like an impregnable brand.

How we value it

The number and the reasoning

Vort fair value

$50

A probability-weighted valuation on fiscal 2029 earnings — three years out, because a consumer turnaround is not resolved inside a single year — across scenarios from $29 to $86, against a price of $38.41: about +30%. Our $50 sits almost exactly on the consensus of $50.66 across 39 analysts, who rate the shares a hold. The rating differs because the arithmetic does: 30% of upside clears our buy threshold. We accumulate below $34.

Multiples

P/E reported FY2026
~18.3×
P/E ex-tariff recovery
~24×
P/E on FY2029E Base
~14×
Dividend yield
~4.2%

What could go wrong

4 risks, in order

  1. The brand impairment proves permanent

    Consumer brands do lose their position for good — it has happened to companies that looked as secure as this one. Our Bear case carries a 40% weight for exactly that reason, and it values the shares at $29.

  2. Greater China keeps declining

    High probability, high severity. Domestic brands have taken the category and the consumer environment is weak. What was the growth engine is now a drag.

  3. Direct falls faster than wholesale rebuilds

    Total revenue stays flat while the mix shifts toward the lower-margin channel. That is precisely what fiscal 2026 looked like.

  4. A dividend cut

    Low probability, high severity. At 4.2% the yield is a material part of the case; a cut would remove the compensation for waiting.

In conclusion

The free summary ends here

Where we stand

BUY

Fair value $50, 12-month target $50, low conviction. At $38.41 the market prices a permanently impaired Nike — a brand that never again earns what it earned four years ago. North America growing, wholesale rebuilding and a covered 4.2% dividend argue that is too harsh. The counterweight is honest: two years of turnaround have produced flat revenue, China is still falling, and the reported multiple is flattered by a one-off. We accumulate below $34 — and first-quarter results land within three weeks of publication.

Sources

That was the extract. The full report contains the valuation, the scenarios and what would change our mind.

Download the PDF